This appeared to be the case for almost every browser that was “super fast” using Chrome or Firefox rendering engine. What I noticed in testing around 50+ browsers, is that Safari was definitely junk, most browsers had a derivative of Chrome or Firefox web engines did worse than just using Firefox or Chrome.Įxamples: SRWare Iron appeared to be around 10x faster than Chrome in 3D, but I noticed that it rendered elements in the 3D inaccurately & in the wrong colors. I did testing of browsers a while back, but I tested them on: Would be great to know how browsers compare now, seeing Firefox is at version 48 instead of 15.01, & Chrome is at 52, instead of 21. Only the extreme HV3/NetSurf stay with low usage. I use Vivaldi as my main browser and I must say the difference in RAM usage after half a day of browsing (opening/closing hundreds of tabs) is not huge compared to lightweight K-Meleon, Slimboat and GreenBrowser as single-process browsers don’t release memory so well when closing tabs. Slimboat is good but has many websites incompatibilities (including YouTube) and it not worth the trouble over K-Meleon, IMHO. GreenBrowser is very light but doesn’t release memory well and uses too much RAM after hours of browsing (+breaks many websites). HV3 and NetSurf are extremely efficient (fast, low RAM & CPU) but too extreme for everyday use (broken websites, no video). When looking for a very lightweight browser, I went through: HV3, NetSurf, GreenBrowser, SlimBoat, K-Meleon (in increasing RAM usage order) and chosed K-Meleon 76.2 which handles complex websites (including YouTube) and releases memory quite well for a single process browser when closing tabs. For example, a Flash blocking tool would increase the browser’s used memory slightly, but load times and CPU usage would be reduced. As expected, CPU usage goes up greatly with any kind of Flash on the page, some browsers hitting 80% on a single processor core.Īs many of the browsers use plug-ins or extensions to enhance them even further, this would affect all these scores greatly. What the test does show is that overall it’s not a good idea to leave a webpage open on your machine with something like a Flash animation running for long periods of time, especially a laptop or netbook. High memory and CPU usage playing Flash meant Chrome surprisingly wasn’t great either, which is probably why they’re concentrating on these areas in future versions.It’s not clear if Apple have discontinued Safari, but with it’s high memory usage in this test and terrible load time of the 10 test pages, I’m not sure why anyone would want to use it.Avant’s nice idea of 3 different switchable browser engines in the same browser sounds like a good idea, but needs a lot more work to make it fully optimized and really worth using.Firefox has improved a lot recently in resource usage, but few people run it without plug-ins so the memory usage and load time will likely increase when several are added.The interface is not the best, but compatibility should be good as it uses the Internet Explorer Trident rendering engine. A resource friendly surprise was GreenBrowser as it loaded fast, was low on memory and kept CPU usage to a minimum.Predictably Opera was the fastest to load and stayed low on CPU usage when viewing Flash rich pages, although the problems it still has viewing some webpages properly might put people off.
#What is the best browser for windows 10 chrome not keygen#
Do note the “Peak CPU usage” is AFTER the pages have fully loaded and not while loading, all browsers hit 100% during that time.
Green is obviously the best and pink is the worst for each category. To summarize the results from all the browser’s RAM and CPU usage, here’s a simple table showing the scores. On testing, the 64-bit version peaked at 71% CPU and used 351MB of memory. CPU Usage: Mostly between 0% and 10%, peaked at 60% during Flash animation.ĭownload Internet Explorer 9 (Vista and 7 only)ĬPU Usage: Mostly between 0% and 10%, peaked at 54% during Flash animation.ĬPU Usage: Mostly between 0% and 10%, peaked at 61% during Flash animation.ĬPU Usage: Mostly between 0% and 7%, peaked at 30% during Flash animation.ĬPU Usage: Mostly between 3% and 10%, peaked at 81% during Flash animation.
0 kommentar(er)
